|
|
TATTERS Cal: Tatters is a supernatural series set in a ghetto. Isnt that a risky concept? In peoples minds ghettos are usually identified with very real and very series social problems, not people running around with special abilities. SJ: Theres a couple of ways to approach a series like Tatters. One is the Green Lantern/Green /Arrow way and preach about a social injustice each issue. The other is to incorporate the problems into the fabric of your stories. Im opting for the latter. Cal: So Tatters wont cover such topics as gang violence or welfare families directly, preferring to relegate them to the background? SJ: Tatters is entertainment. It doesnt "cover" anything. Dont confuse it with news magazines. "Covering" a topic is journalisms job. Cal: But no relevant stories in Tatters? SJ: Theyre relevant in that theyre pertinent
and to the point. But I didnt create Tatters to be a social-ill-of-the-month comic.
Thats a sure-fire recipe for failure. Listen, a few days ago I was reading an issue
of Cinefantastique that spotlighted the Batman Animated Series. And in it one of the
producers, Bruce Timm, complained about an episode called "The Forgotten" where
homeless men disappear and no one seems to care. Timms complaint was that it was
impossible to meaningfully explore the homeless problem in a 22-minute action cartoon.
Bruce Wayne does offer a couple of homeless guys jobs at Wayne Enterprises at the end of
the episode, which is nice and all but really only puts a band-aid on the bigger problem. Cal: I want to hear how you plan to prevent Tatters from becoming didactic, but, first, lets establish what the series is about. Who is Tatters? What is his reason for existing? SJ: Tatters is Peter Collinson, but he doesnt know
who Peter Collinson is. Its a name he made up for himself. A Peter Collins in
theater slang is a nobody, so Peter Collinson is a nobodys son. Cal: Do you plan to keep Collinsons true identity a secret for many issues? SJ: No. Keeping readers hanging too long is for soap operas. I think its lazy and annoying. I want to establish who Collinson is no later than issue five, sooner if possible. It is crucial Collinson remember who he is, however, so no matter what this is not going to be a drawn-out mystery, no. Cal: Does Collinson have any memories from his past at all? SJ: Yes. Collinson remembers he used to work for a federal intelligence agency called Branch4, and that Branch4 had something to do with his psychic abilities, although how precisely he doesnt know. Yet. He remembers one person from his past, a Branch4 agent named Lynn Delaware, but he has no idea what their relationship used to be. Oh, I almost forgot. Collinson is also being haunted by the ghost of another Branch4 agent named Aslanbek Saltev. Cal: Well its a start. SJ: Its a mess. Id feel sorry for the guy if I wasnt capitalizing on his miseries. Cal: How does Collinson benefit from taking on the role of Tatters? SJ: It doesnt benefit him at all, except he sympathizes with the residents of the ghetto where he lives. The ghetto is called the Warrens. Collinson wants to help his neighbors, and becoming Tatters seems the best way. Cal: His motives are purely altruistic? SJ: Hell, no. But, listen, from Collinsons point of view he has no past, no present, and dim prospects for a future. He comes to the Warrens and finds himself in the middle of a group of people who, for the most part, are decent but down at the heels. These people havent been shown how to access the opportunities available to Americans, and, worse, are being taken advantage of by all sorts of bottom-feeders like corrupt politicians, activist social workers, ruthless drug dealers, and vicious gang bangers. As Collinson sees it he and the people living in the Warrens share the exact same past, present, and future, so he sympathizes with them, which makes him want to help change things for the better in the Warrens. Cal: By becoming Tatters and disappearing into shadows? SJ: You use the tools available. Collinson is, like I said, an educated and dangerous man. He also believes in justice. He was a federal agent, remember. But its not like Peter Collinson is a success story for other people to admire and emulate. He is, quite simply, a nobody. But what if some icon some symbol some hero tried to get people in the Warrens excited about improving their neighborhood or their lot in life? Someone more immediate than Michael Jordan? And not a dark knight avenger or super-powered immigrant from another world, but a hero who looks like he belongs in the Warrens. Was a part of it. Now there you might have a notion. The important thing, though, is that Peter Collinson, whoever he really is, is not the kind of guy who sits on his duff while innocent people are being taken advantage of. Cal: All right. So then how do you intend to prevent Tatters from being as preachy a series as you claim Green Lantern/Green Arrow was? SJ: Theres a writers commandment: "Show. Dont tell." Thats how. Putting a cause over story- and by story I mean characterization, plot, dialogue, structure the whole shebang- creates didacticism, and didacticism is not entertainment. It has its purpose, definitely, but entertaining isnt one of them. |